Skip to content

Additional resources for earning interest in gold

FAQ

Why earn interest on gold and silver? If you’re short on time or simply prefer to watch instead
Read more

8 responses to “Bitcoin: Oh Why Did You Have to Crash?”

  1. While I am a big fan of gold, and of silver to a lesser extent, I need to take some issue with your comments. First, Bitcoin has only had any sort of a market cap worth mentioning for about 3 months. That is hardly enough time for a market to develop. Secondly, Bit coin is not based on the “Labor Theory of Value”. Value is determined strictly by supply and demand. Mining is only a (rather ingenious) method of bringing Bitcoins into existence and limiting their number.

    Taking a snapshot of the “book” after a crash where trading had essentially ceased is hardly indicative of the viability of any tradable item. Prior to the crash, spreads had been razor thin and there were 10s of thousands of orders on either side of the ledger. The market is certainly thin compared to almost any other market but the market is far younger.

    DDoS is a definite problem and needs to be addressed, as does the lack of competing exchanges.

    I think more studies and comparisons are very useful but you need to start from a solid grounding. By the way, I do agree that Bitcoin, while it may be a medium of exchange, is not money. It has no intrinsic value outside of its limited use.

  2. Shitcoin? Scamcoin? Baloneycoin?

    Your “gold-redeemable cryptographic based currency” sounds good but isn’t the question just how does one make such a cryptographic based currency REAL?

    Mind you, the $ is doing a good job of making fools out of us all, no?

  3. worth to listen … http://www.goldmoney.com/podcast/the-great-gold-vs-bitcoin-debate-casey-vs-matonis.html?gmrefcode=upner
    for now bitcoin is just a starting project if it is currency we will see or money in secondary order;
    money will be gold and silver – not sure if bitcoin and if we are able to find infinite sources of energy to mine gold by nano-technology from sea water … money will be somethig else …
    interesting point in the GM podcast is taht bitcoin has its intrinstic value as a network of individuals to be able to use it as payment system … I think to diversify some part of portfolio into the BTC is reasonable (up to 5%) …

  4. Keith, I already mentioned on the Facebook post you commented to, that using bitcoin-24.com’s USD market to judge the BTCUSD market depth is ridiculous. That’s like saying the gold market depth is tiny because I can’t dump a ton of gold on the guy down the corner that sells me 1 oz Eagles.

    Mt. Gox has 80% of the entire BTCUSD market [1]. bitcoin-24.com’s 30-day USD volume is a tiny 0.14% of that of Mt. Gox [2] (bitcoin-24.com mainly deals in EUR).

    [1] http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/currency/USD.html
    [2] http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/btc24USD.html http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/mtgoxUSD.html

  5. Bitcoin is an experiment that is fun and interesting and obviously very volatile. I believe the fiat dollar has had it’s ups and downs too relative to other moneys. I find no benefit in mocking the attempt to help unshackle the world from the yoke that fiat money keeps us tied to. Rather we should be looking at what is good and helpful about bitcoin and how it or something like it (bitcoin tied to precious metals?) could completely get us away from the sorry state of affairs that passes for economic policy today.

  6. You are attacking a revolutionary new currency that is still in its infancy, expecting it to show the market depth and liquidity of a currency that is 5,000 years old? The wide bid/ask is a result of the fiat-to-BTC bottlenecks. This will change. Gox is not a proper exchange.

    “Multiple competing crypto-currencies would dimish the value of one another (not to mention blow away the whole idea of the cap on the number of currency units in circulation).”

    Not so: the network effect is obviously an asset and first-move advantage ensures that any competitor would need to be overwhelmingly superior. The other currencies add to the value of bitcoin because they offer refuge from fiat volatility. Personally I never intend to exchange bitcoin for fiat.

    Yes gold is a “good.” It is a good that is CENTRALIZED in the hands of what, 5% of the world’s population? Not so good for everyone else.

    If a liquid exchange develops between gold and bitcoin, why would bitcoin not be your Bitgold? (Outside of the theoretical objections about what money is.)

  7. Thanks for your comments.

    mossmoon: One recurring theme on this blog is that gold is not centralized. Also, redeemability does not mean that there is a market price. Redeemability means that there is someone who will honor a committed redemption value or be forced into liquidation in the attempt. Redeemability cannot be created after the fact.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?

Feel free to contribute!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.